Theres also an awesome read comparing the top three prohormones in the April 2004 issue of Muscular Development mag....

good read.

gymphreak- in your other post you said "yeah, ive been reading up on that stuff alot.....I am thinking of getting either M1T, M4-AD or Methyldienolone. I have considered 1-Test, but am more linient towards M1T or methyl."

Is M4-AD the same as the 4-AD article you just posted?

This patrick arnold never said what his views were on 1-Test or M1T.. does anybody know?

p.s you wouldn't be able to by any chance post that article would you?

if you can't post it, what was the consensus of the article?

I would post the article from MD if i had the patience to type up the 4 page article. ...Basically the article summed up how the top three prosteroids compared to one another.....He said that M1T is by far the best for packing on mass and boosting strength, and that its almost 44 times more potent than primo.....Also the article said that M4-AD is supposed to be the least toxic to the body of all methylated prosteroids sold on the market today....that most people saw results at 50mg a day...and that the worse side effect was oily skin, acne on the back/shoulders...

M4-AD is the methylated (sp?) version of 4-AD I believe....Im not entirely sure yet

and as far as I know, M1T is by far the most dominant and best "pro"steroid there is....from what people say on this site and other forums...Ive personally heard people say that theyve gained as much as 10 lbs in 10 days on this stuff...so...