Universal Products (page 4)| www.bb-forums.com

Quote:

i do not care for thier supplements too much cause of the facts you stated above.

Their prohormones in the Animal Stack are under-dosed and inferior. In fact, rarely any companies use 4-adione or any other dione for that ammter because of its inferiority.

Also, dehydroepiandrosterone is included in this stack (a.ka. DHEA). This is hardly a prohormone for body builders (and should never be used for mass gaining purposes). DHEA more readily converts to estrogen rather than testosterone. I would not recommend DHEA to ANYONE under the age of 40 or 50. SImply because it will be ineffective and will most likely be detrimental.

Reply » Universal Products

Thanks guys this helps a lot. I'll keep studying on the "homemade" stuff I read about on this board. I like the idea of applying something on my skin rather than inject it.

Reply » Universal Products

Quote:

yes, transdermal is a good alternative to I.M.

Reply » Universal Products

So what is the significance of prohormones in the Animal Stack or the lack there-of in "m." Anyone please? I mean, what are the pro's and con's to it being in the pill or not. Also, on the list of ingredients in animal cut or "m," I did not see tryptophane. I thought this was in their as well??

Thanks!

Page 4 of 4

1 2 3 4

Bodybuilding » Bodybuilding discussion forums » Discussions about other sports