Hello,
Ive already read on the board that theres no problem on using the 0.45µ filters for gear. Now Im wondering if the solution is still as clear as when using a 0.22µ filter? I dont think that dirt dust or whatever is smaller than 0.45µ or am I wrong? |
| Reply » 0.22µ vs. 0.45µ filters |
Dust is a very vague term. But let us say to things: - 0.45µ is very small; much smaller than dust particles that you can see
- The practical experience of many indicates that 0.45µ is sufficient.
|
| Reply » 0.22µ vs. 0.45µ filters |
Will the 0.45 accelerate the filtration process? Im still about to cry when I think of my last boldenone gear I made and how long it took me to filter it.
Edit:
Thanks for yor fast reply mranak its always good to know where yo can ask questions and get a fast answer...
|
| Reply » 0.22µ vs. 0.45µ filters |
Yes, filtering with a .45 is faster for sure.
|
| Reply » 0.22µ vs. 0.45µ filters |
if your looking for how long it takes try these. They go pretty fast and are .22 and can take alot more volume through them. http://researchlabsupply.com/Script...p?idproduct=276
|
| Reply » 0.22µ vs. 0.45µ filters |
Also, if you're gonna filter using a syringe, dont use bigger than a 10cc. The bigger it is the slower the process. 5cc best and the fastest, just more screwing and unscrewing but easy on the hands.
|
|
Page 1 of 2 |
Menu
0.22µ vs. 0.45µ filters