I am big believer in low dose cycles... check this thread from the past....some good info..

http://www.steroidology.com/forum/s...ead.php?t=51758

I would add in test but low dose I.e 500mg can def make you grow like a weed.

one of my buddies in my town used to be the biggest guy in town... he was fuckin massive until he had kidney failure... but he was telling me when he cycled he would take 200mg of test a week and take that for 15-20 weeks... he said the gains are slower but the amount of good solid muscle you put on and keep is worth it more than running a high dose cycle and getting all the water retention along with it

Thank you for the great info. I am seeing that I seem to like the slower gain cycles. Perhaps 2 light 10-12 week cycles a year. Just a bit of a kick for an old man!

I am not sure, but I am actually contemplating a 10 week no sides cycle of the following: 300mg equipoise (10 weeks)
30 mg Anavar for (5 weeks) creatine for the 1st 5 weeks

I just want a bit more gains than the stuff they sell you at GNC. I'm 36 now and have tried all the bullshit products and scams of the 1980's and 1990's. Cybergenics, hot stuff, smilax, dibencozide, bulls testicles, liver tabs, etc. Thank you for any input at all. I have never done test before and my neighbor wants me to do a ten weeker of 500 mg wk enanthanate/300 mg wk equipoise and 40 miligrams of turinabol for the 1st 5 weeks. (Sounds really tempting!)

I've done cycles at as high dosages as test 600mg/week and deca 400mg a week for 8-10 weeks. And I've done cycles as low as test 200mg/week and deca 200mg/week for 20 weeks. For me the the low dosage, longer cycles are more beneficial. I experience little water retention and great strentgh gains. I also keep my gains in muscle and strength. After I hit a cycle I run Clomid and hcg. No need for me to ever go back to the high dosage shorter cycles when I'm ready to bulk again.