I personally prefer IGF bc I see results quicker. I'm impatient. Also, as a diabetic it is best for me to keep the two under shorter usage since they both affect my blood sugar levels. The IGF has a more pronounced effect on my blood sugars, but the shorter length of effective use ends up outweighing the benefits of using HGH in the long run. But in the game of hormonal manipulation you will find out that everyone is different. Best bet is to try both and compare/contrast.

so can u only take igf-1 for a short time?, what kinda results you experiencing with igf-1? with gh iv lost quite alot of bf, recovering quicker and strengh has increased but not through the roof like some people say.

and is it undetectable like gh is at the moment?
cheers bm

to be honset with u, u are not going to see results from either one until a period of time. with igf, the new muscle cells need to mature inorder for u to see them. with hgh, it takes at least 6 months to see anything. so if u are looking for quick results, then find some d-bol

To my knowledge IGF-1 is the active byproduct of GH and it is cheaper. So it would be my pref

Is this true?! Thats crazy. I could never take something for 6 months. I like to go on, gain, and come off.