I read an article in Muscular development in the anabolic freak's column. dave polumbo said that he recomends cycles be no shorter than 16 weeks. He actually said that a 5 - 6 month cycle is best because your body can get used to the weight and new muscle. I was just wondering how many of you agree. I found in my own experience that the longer I am on the more muscle I retain. |
| Reply » Article in MD |
Dave Palumbo also recommends outrageous doses of multiple oral steroids ran for numerous weeks on end as well as stating that running Clomid during your cycle will help your natural testosterone levels going even while running massive doses of AAS. In my opinion I would take anything he says with a grain of salt.
|
| Reply » Article in MD |
The dosages are outragous buti was talking about the whole time length issue. I can relate that when i stay on longer I keep 85-90% of my gains. I never go longer that 16 weeks. But I have done shorter cycles though.
|
| Reply » Article in MD |
Yeah, the shorter cycles versus longer cycles debate has raged on forever with guys coming down on each side of the issue. It basically depends on how you react to your cycles as an individual. Some guys will do well with shorter cycles and others with longer. All we can do is experiment and see what seems to work the best for ourselves.
|
| Reply » Article in MD |
what i wanna know is what does dave palumbo take that makes his face look like that. Is it gh or heavy androgen use.
|
| Reply » Article in MD |
MD recommends that "begginers start with a base of 1,000mg of Testtosterone D-bol weeks 1-4". What bs.
I think it comes down to a personal thing, do what works for you. Medium cycles work best for me right now...
|
|
Page 1 of 3 |
Menu
Article in MD